Antidepressants: the role of statistical manipulation
According to pharmacologist Laura de Wit, there is little cause for concern about the increase in antidepressants among women. Is that true?
'I also regret that it is in the news when 3,000 more people take medication, but not when there are 3,000 fewer. Then we can also ask ourselves: is this a good sign, do we want to celebrate it? Or does this mean that we are prescribing it too little?” An incredible piece of static alchemy by pharmacologist Laura de Wit on the LINDA site about the increase in the number of women and girls taking antidepressants, as Zorgkenniscentrum Nivel announced in early September.
Nothing to worry about. “It's only about 3,000 more women. 3,000 additional women, out of a total of over 1 million. I don't think that's extreme, it can also be a natural variation that occurs occasionally.” Statistical alchemy, inimitable arguments by a modern witchmaker. Especially the “does this mean that we're prescribing too little?” I find it rather worrying. Is this the compassionate pharmacologist who no one wants to miss?
Antidepressants are also not addictive at all, says propagandist psychiatrist and clinical pharmacologist Laura de Wit on the site where girls and women get their news from. “You only get 'withdrawal symptoms'. That's what she calls it. But never a craving for more.
Apparently, Laura forgets about recent history for a while, where Librium and Valium sold like hotcakes. Which, of course, would also not be addictive at all. The drugs were promoted as a genius penicillin against the blues. What advertising budgets were thrown at that coronavirus propaganda can learn something from. Before that, just read “The Age of Anxiety” by Andrea Tone. America's turbulent affair with psychopharmaceuticals. And turbulent, in my opinion, is an understatement.
And has Laura also completely forgotten about the opioid crisis with oxytocin? That stuff wouldn't be addictive at all either. We really have to believe the science! The opposite was the case, of course, supported by the elite guild of pharmacologists. Read my blog about Purdue Pharma's Sackler family who killed 400,000 thousand people. More deaths than in all the wars that the US has fought since the Second World War. (and there are quite a few, as we know). They bought up scientific magazines and promoted their addictive stuff there. By the way, anyone who thinks that the opioid crisis is over will be deceived. Prescribing addictive painkillers continues, under other names, with other players.
And then that text: “You don't just choose antidepressants, only when you really need to. Then that's just brave. If someone has a headache, we don't think it's crazy if they take acetaminophen either, right?” Yes, I also always turn off the red light in the car when it comes on. Then there is nothing wrong right away. The whole geruststellend.Dat headache, depression, is a sign of something else, so what? You're just going to fight it with a pill. You simply turn off the red light. Nothing bad is going on anymore.
With support from the pharmaceutical industry and the media (LINDA. is doing its best today), the myth is spreading in mental health care that almost all psychiatric illnesses can be treated with medication. The truth is that most psychotropic drugs do more harm than good to patients and that their excessive use leads to an alarming number of deaths. That's what Peter Gotzche, Danish doctor and professor of clinical research, supported years ago with a large amount of independent research and case studies. Read that book!
#Gezondheid #fulvinezuur #fulvinezuren #fulvicacids#gezondoudworden #voedingssupplementen #natuurlijkesupplementen #fulvicacid
